Will Hart is an idiot
Aug. 28th, 2015 08:38 amI am currently reading "Forbidden History," a book of collected articles from the magazine "Atlantis Rising." Now, I like these kinds of books because some of the things in it are quite reasonable, there's a number of authors relegated to the pseudo-science sections despite the fact that their science is impeccable and their conclusions are reasonable, and the entrenched academia nuts just don't like to have their little worldviews shattered. A lot of now official science was once considered pseudoscience just because the intelligentsia were too fond of their own pet theories to even consider the evidence, and there's a LOT of legitimately researched artifacts dug up and reliably dated by professionals in the field, that is getting suppressed because it doesn't fit the currently accepted theories of the powerful elite academics.
Also, I'm really into out of place artifacts, and I genuinely believe that human civilization is a lot older than is accepted, because the evidence is there and there's a lot of it. And the evidence that is most commonly known is only about half of that evidence. Plus, I really love watching modern academics scratching their heads in confusion at some of the things ancient peoples managed to do and make.
And a large part of how this got started for me was the book "Uriel's Machine" by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas. Years ago, I checked out that book thinking it would be full of hilarious bullshit, up there with anything at all written by David Hatcher Childress, or at least fascinating bullshit that would make great fiction, like all that Giza Death Star stuff. I was quite astonished, then, to find a book that could - and SHOULD - be taken seriously by modern archaeologists, geologists, and anthropologists. They got me into catastrophism as well. (Though maybe I was predisposed to that, given all the Velikovsky books my dad owned.)
So in "Forbidden History" and related books, we find an interesting mix; some articles are fascinating BS that would make great fiction, some are hilarious BS that will make you bust a gut laughing, and some are things that should totally be taken seriously by modern academia.
Will Hart is another matter altogether. I have read exactly two of his articles, and I have decided to avoid the rest of his shit from now on. He's one of these people who knows just enough about certain things to sound like he knows what he's talking about, but a sufficiently intelligent mind will quickly figure out that the idiot has no fucking idea what he's talking about. His articles are rife with assumptions, strange failures of imagination paradoxically coupled with an absurd overabundance of imagination (specifically, he lacks practical imagination, IE the ability to think about how things could practically be done by people in situations other than his own), and he's one of those people that's like "I don't know how the ancient peoples did that, they're too stupid to have figured that out on their own, thus it must be aliens." And that attitude has always infuriated me.
A few bits of his, and my responses:
( Long post is long. )
So yeah, Will Hart is a fucking idiot and I will not be reading any more of his dreck.
Also, I'm really into out of place artifacts, and I genuinely believe that human civilization is a lot older than is accepted, because the evidence is there and there's a lot of it. And the evidence that is most commonly known is only about half of that evidence. Plus, I really love watching modern academics scratching their heads in confusion at some of the things ancient peoples managed to do and make.
And a large part of how this got started for me was the book "Uriel's Machine" by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas. Years ago, I checked out that book thinking it would be full of hilarious bullshit, up there with anything at all written by David Hatcher Childress, or at least fascinating bullshit that would make great fiction, like all that Giza Death Star stuff. I was quite astonished, then, to find a book that could - and SHOULD - be taken seriously by modern archaeologists, geologists, and anthropologists. They got me into catastrophism as well. (Though maybe I was predisposed to that, given all the Velikovsky books my dad owned.)
So in "Forbidden History" and related books, we find an interesting mix; some articles are fascinating BS that would make great fiction, some are hilarious BS that will make you bust a gut laughing, and some are things that should totally be taken seriously by modern academia.
Will Hart is another matter altogether. I have read exactly two of his articles, and I have decided to avoid the rest of his shit from now on. He's one of these people who knows just enough about certain things to sound like he knows what he's talking about, but a sufficiently intelligent mind will quickly figure out that the idiot has no fucking idea what he's talking about. His articles are rife with assumptions, strange failures of imagination paradoxically coupled with an absurd overabundance of imagination (specifically, he lacks practical imagination, IE the ability to think about how things could practically be done by people in situations other than his own), and he's one of those people that's like "I don't know how the ancient peoples did that, they're too stupid to have figured that out on their own, thus it must be aliens." And that attitude has always infuriated me.
A few bits of his, and my responses:
( Long post is long. )
So yeah, Will Hart is a fucking idiot and I will not be reading any more of his dreck.