alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
About the new Lord of the Rings prequel: I'm almost certain I'm not going to watch it. Maybe it'll be good, maybe not. I don't know and I don't care. I liked the books, read them in the 90's when I was in high school, but I haven't read them again since. I liked the movies, saw them once but haven't seen them again. That's how I am with most things. I watch it once, and even if I like it I don't watch it again. There are a few exceptions like some TV series (Avatar, Legend of Korra, FMA: Brotherhood, Rick and Morty, a few others) but most of the stories I experience I simply experience, like, and move on.

I haven't seen the Hobbit movies. I tried reading the book and hated it so much I couldn't get past the second chapter. It reminded me too much of that Tom Bombadil BS. (That scene nearly made me ragequit the series.) I have no intention of seeing the Hobbit movies because I've long since gotten a summary of the story, and it didn't sound at all impressive. Then too, they stretched a story that should have been a 60 minute movie into three movies, which is never a good sign.

I like LOTR. It's a good story. The movie produces good memes. But it's not so good a story that I want to watch a prequel of it. I will not be contributing to the over-milking of this particular cash cow. No judgment to those who want to watch it, nor to those who watched the Hobbit movies. It's nothing more or less than my opinion: LOTR was good, and I like the memes and the discussions about the series, but I literally do not care at all about the prequel series, just like I had (and continue to have) no interest in the Hobbit movies.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I just now realized what I think is the original reason I started being scared of dogs. I'm autistic, I don't like sudden loud noises and never have. Which, a bark is a sudden loud noise. Also, my brain processes barks as being dog shouts, and therefore thinks of a dog's bark as inherently aggressive since human shouts are often aggressive.

I have, over the years, developed a great many other reasons to be scared of dogs (as well as to not like even the ones that don't scare me -- reasons that can best be summed up as "too much like extroverted humans but you can't reason with them, and also they do a lot of disgusting stuff"), but it's interesting to realize the origin of that fear was tiny, autistic child me being terrorized by this sudden, unexpected, aggressive noise from a big animal with sharp teeth; something that became a Core Memory.™

And I came to this realization by finally analyzing why I don't have a problem with wolves, but I do have a problem with dogs: wolves don't bark, at least not much. They're also much more intelligent than dogs, and they're pretty chill as long as you're not threatening them.

With dogs, I constantly have to guess whether their barks are aggressive or not. With wolves, if they're being aggressive it's bloody obvious because they bare their teeth and growl. So yeah... like humans, dogs are a challenge, trying to figure out what they're actually saying. And it seems to me like other people have dogs figured out the same way most other people have other people figured out, and I don't. And given that humans can at least be reasoned with because they at least theoretically understand my language, they're less of a threat than dogs are.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
So there was this Boomer meme where they were like "Before GPS, we had to ask directions." This was my response:

Yes, and before lighters, you had to rub two sticks together, or hit a piece of flint against some metal. Asking directions has always been a total PITA. I dunno about the rest of you, but I can never decipher anyone else's directions because I can't even see the road names usually, I have no idea which way is north etc, I have no idea how to measure a mile, blocks are all different sizes in all the cities I've been in, and the things I notice as landmarks and the things other people count as landmarks are very different. I just don't view the world the same way most people do, I guess.

I also suck at GIVING directions, for many of the same reasons. If giving directions to someone like myself, I would measure distance in walking time, point out landmarks like "the tree that looks like it's judging everyone who walks by it," use only right/left/forward/back instead of the compass directions, say things like "turn left onto the street where there's a purple house a couple houses down, walk five minutes, then turn left again at the flower mural on the street." I end up spending so much time trying to convert my system to something they can understand that they usually give up or someone else steps in. And gods forbid I need to give directions to someone in a car.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I don't think there's any bigger red flag in the world than "(name) is a devout/religious person" and "(name) is a good Christian person." And note, I'm not talking about most religions. I'm talking specifically about Christians. There is no bigger of a red flag than for someone to be a "good Christian."

For my evidence: hundreds, thousands, even hundreds of thousands of cases of child molesters, rapists, serial killers, and other criminals who everyone thought was harmless because they were "religious," "devout," and/or "Christian."

Which is why it baffles me so much when I keep seeing people in true crime videos saying they trusted someone because they were a "good Christian." People who fit that description somehow make so many other people feel safe and comfortable, and I don't get it. Because to anyone with any sense or brains, like me, someone being a "good Christian" is not only a giant red flag, it's a red alert klaxon, multiple sirens going off, and the emergency alert tone all rolled into one.

Far from such people being comforting or safe to me, I am 100 times more on edge and wary of anyone who talks even a little too much about their Christianity, or someone whom others describe as a "good Christian" or "religious" in the Christian sense. I would literally rather spent six months surrounded by proselytizing vegans than spend more than five minutes around a "good Christian." Because with people like that, the odds are VERY high that they're not only not a good person, but are in fact one of the worst people you could ever have the misfortune to meet.

I'm not saying there aren't good Christians. But good Christians, like good vegans, will hardly talk about that part of their identity at all. Maybe even to the point where you're genuinely surprised to find out they're Christian. Genuinely good Christians are just good people without having to talk much about their path. This works on the same principle as "if someone has to tell you they're a nice guy, they're almost certainly NOT a nice guy." But also applies to actions as well. Obvious cross or Jesus fish jewelry, carries around a Bible all the time, or talks like a preacher are just some examples of such actions.

So yeah. I refuse to trust anyone who's a bit too obvious about trying to be a "good Christian." Granted, I don't really trust most people in the world, but that general distrust is a 3 or 4 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being highest. Whereas my distrust of "good Christians" is a 13 on that scale.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
When someone on my feed is excited about their kid getting some paper 'award' thing, it can be difficult for me to muster any kind of enthusiasm because some of the things schools "reward" kids with are just kind of... meh. Like attendance and citizenship. I was an absolutely wretched student, for reasons that boil down to me being autistic and ADHD, and yet I would always get attendance awards because my parents wouldn't let me avoid school despite it being Hell for me on basically every level, unless I was genuinely too sick to attend. And the worst part was, since I was constantly sick with colds (like seriously, it never let up) I technically was always too sick for school. I was 100% too sick to have gone to work if I'd been that sick as an adult. Yet I was still forced to go anyway. It's a wonder all the other kids didn't get sick from me, too.

And attendance awards were basically just, to me, pieces of paper saying "C o n g r a t s on not being too sick for school this quarter, according to us adults who don't have enough sense to fill a thimble! You're being given this useless award for being forced to go somewhere you're constantly being bullied, somewhere where there are too many people in one place, where it's such a sensory nightmare and nightmare in general that you have to dissociate and live in your own imaginary world cut off from reality just to get through the day! A place that can't even deliver on the promise of being able to teach you!" (Seriously, I learned more from a single week of PBS than I learned in five YEARS of school.)

Citizenship awards were even more pointless than attendance awards, in my experience. On the surface of it, you'd think this would be a good award. Sounds like something you get for helping old ladies cross the street, picking up litter in the neighborhood, or feeding homeless people. But no. At least in the schools I went to, they were code for "you're well behaved." I kept getting them just for being a quiet kid who wasn't a dick to other people and in fact barely socialized with anyone because socializing for me is already exhausting, socializing with people I don't like is even more exhausting and isn't even rewarding to compensate for the exhaustion, and socializing with people I don't like while immersed in the ND equivalent of WW1 trench warfare every weekday was just one more thing chipping away at my energy and sanity.

And what kind of reward is a piece of paper anyway? At least stickers were cool and pretty and could be stuck to fun places.

So yeah, really hard for me to muster even a semblance of enthusiasm for people when they post about these stupid paper awards that schools give to kids. Especially when the award in question isn't one I'm familiar with, and/or has a nebulous description. Even if I want to be supportive, I can't help thinking "So is this something they *should* celebrate, like 'you've made real progress learning math,' or is it something pointless and stupid like attendance or citizenship?"

Oh yeah and even before the pandemic I've always thought it stupid that we basically send our walking petri dishes to spend time around hundreds of other walking petri dishes just so they can try and fail to learn from a bunch of people who suck massively at teaching. Instead of doing that, we should just let neighborhood kids exist together in an environment where they're learning the natural way kids do, with a few adults around to supervise and help the kids find the answers to their questions, rather than trying to program them like robots on an assembly line.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I'm kind of curious how many of the people who are against spanking (as I am) because of the whole "if they can't understand why you're hurting them, that's abuse" thing are also people who have no issue with piercing infants' ears. Because there's so much hypocrisy from all kinds of people in the world that I just KNOW there's at least a small percentage of people with that particular hypocrisy.

Spanking. Ear piercing. Circumcision and other genital mutilation. Forcing kids to get hugs or other touches from relatives they don't know. Invading children's privacy (sometimes even to the point of removing their bedroom door as punishment). Stealing from kids by taking back gifts or confiscating their things for punishment. Probably a lot more I've forgotten. There are just Too Many different ways people abuse children every day in ways that are legal and socially acceptable, even common.

Honestly, at least in the US, fully 95% of adults shouldn't be allowed to raise children. Or should at least be given extensive parenting classes before they're allowed to do it.

And I'm by no means putting myself up on a pedestal as one of those rare people who should be allowed to raise kids. Far from it! Anyone who's known me for more than about 10 minutes knows I'm nowhere close to being good parent material, and I know it. Kids crying is a trauma trigger for me, and my response to trauma triggers is anger that eventually turns to rage meltdowns if I can't get away safely and quickly. Rage meltdowns that include throwing things and screaming if I let them get that far. NOT a good combination for a parent to have.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
(This is in no way endorsing one method over another. Just an observation of differences. Especially since there are some foods that just should not touch, ever. It all depends on the foods.)

Other autistics: "These foods must not EVER touch each other!"
Me: "These vegetables are bland as heck. Gonna grab a glob of mashed taters and gravy and dunk it on the veggies to pick them up so the bland is overpowered by the taters and gravy. Then I'll do something similar to the Salisbury steak and potatoes, but not because the meat tastes bad. Just because I feel like it."

Other autistics: "I must eat the same thing for every single meal!"
Me: "I can eat the same thing for most meals, and I enjoy doing so; but I have to give them slight variations, and I have to have at least one meal per day that's something else or I'll get tired of the samefood to the point where I can't eat it at all for several months or even years. This is probably also a form of taking control / self defiance, because if I just eat the same exact thing all the time, I get angry at my past self for thinking this was a good idea."

Other autistics: "I must take the ice from the tray in this specific pattern: from the back to the front, left side to right side."
Me: "I must take the ice from the tray in the most arbitrary way possible, because occasionally doing things chaotically is a stim for me, and an act of defiance against my own usual tendency towards persnicketyness, which for some reason I derive a small amount of joy from doing."
Also me: "I must eat this sandwich in a specific pattern: right corner first, making sure part of the bite goes under the point at which the bread's top crust touches the side crust; then left corner, done in the same way; then the right side again, then the left, until there is a point in the middle; then eat the middle. Repeat until there's not enough sandwich to do so, then revert to chaos."
Also also me: "This is a TUNA SALAD (or chicken salad or egg salad) sandwich, and so I must first remove the crusts from the bread. Eat the sandwich from then as above, until all that's left is crust. Then fold crusts, spoon tuna salad onto the crusts, and eat the result. Repeat until all crusts have been devoured."
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Question came up on an autism community, "have you ever had a party phase?" My answer:

No. I hate parties, always have. I'm an introvert. I don't like crowds. Even spending a few hours with between 1 and 4 friends is draining for me. I *like* socializing with a few friends for a few hours, but I do need time to recharge from it.

I did go to a couple school dances in like, middle school. And I went to two different proms. They were very challenging. It was too dark for there to be so many people around (I like darkness when I'm alone or relatively so, but with more people around I prefer to be able to see the potential threats), it was too loud even when I got as far away from the speakers as I could, and there were too many people. But I had a few people who thought I was like an adorable pathetic socially awkward class mascot who tried to get me to dance with them. (At the time I thought they were trying to be my friends but in retrospect I realize I was too much of a weird nerd and they were thinking of me as a pet or mascot), and for the first couple middle school dances there were a couple girls I had a crush on. But between me being a weird and awkward pathetic nerd, and lily-white me being unsure how to interact with black girls without being accidentally racist, it was very awkward and I never gave any indication of my crushes.

Then in high school, despite continuing to be a weird and awkward nerd, I had the Internet and was able to find a girlfriend who was also a weird and awkward nerd, and we dated long enough that I went to her prom first and then she came to my prom the next year.

So I mean... kinda yes actually? Insofar as I went, and kinda had fun. But when I was younger, my ears were often stuffed up from myriad colds I had, so I couldn't hear as well back then. Since then my immune system did a complete turnaround and now I almost never get sick from contagious diseases. Still have random headaches, backaches, and other "body doing dumb shit" though. I say still because my body was doing those things my whole life on top of me being sick with colds all the time as a kid.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I live in this weird dichotomy in talks about family. Like, my first 9 years of life were pretty good, apart from being bullied at school for being weird (read: autistic, non-binary trans without knowing it until my teenage years, and bisexual). In those years, home was my one safe space. My parents were great. My only complaint about them during that time was them laughing in the face of the doctor who diagnosed me with ADD. In the 80's. You know how fucked up you had to be to be diagnosed with ADD in the 80's? But no, "ThERe's NotHinG wrOng With thEm, tHEY'rE jUsT cREaTivE!" Gee thanks, mom and dad. I might have been a functional human being if you'd taken that doctor seriously.

And then my sister was born, and everything about her turned our lives upside down and inside out, and then did some M. C. Escher shit to it.

So despite pretty good early years, my present reality concerning my family is this: I don't talk to any of them anymore, and it's so bad I'm not even convinced I love any of them anymore. Seriously. The love I once felt for them... when I go looking for it, I get a 404 error. Despite all my parents' many flaws, they are at least both capable of unconditional love, and still love me and my sister despite everything.

But me? My love is completely conditional. I won't just stop loving someone on a mere whim, though. I tried for a couple decades to maintain a relationship with them despite everything, before I finally gave up. But once I give up on someone, that's it. Any good feelings I had for them turn to ashes and even the positive memories taste the way diarrhea smells.

Anyway, reasons for this: My mom is an anti-masker (despite being a Democrat) whom I had to block entirely since it was the only way to get her to shut up about it, my dad is an anti-LGBT bigot,(1) and my sister is a huge transphobe. But then, my sister was a screaming demon child from Hell, the kind of child you rent out to couples thinking about having kids to make them decide to immediately sterilize themselves to prevent the possibility, whose hours-long screaming tantrums triggered me to have autistic meltdowns and also she’s literally (not figuratively) the reason my parents got divorced, so to Hell with her anyway. She's the main reason I left Iowa. But by then I was having enough issues with my parents that I didn't mind moving hundreds of miles away from them, either.

We had myriad other issues before that, my mom and I, like me pointing out that my sister is a lazy parasite living off Mom’s money while refusing to even look for a job or even help around the house, in addition to her being unable to take care of her pets properly. My sister’s guinea pigs smell of piss constantly (or smelled past tense; I doubt they lasted long under her “care”), and she refused to take her stupid dog to the vet despite it having an obvious, disgusting, dripping infection on its dick (like, “its dick is bound to fall off at any moment” level infection.)

The reason she turned out this way? Well once my sister got started crying about something, nothing would stop her short of getting her way. Waiting her out was a pointless waste of time. She's probably autistic as well, but where I was the "unusually quiet autistic child" type, she was the "screaming demonic changeling baby" variety, except they weren't meltdowns she was having, they were actual tantrums. (She had some meltdowns too; I could tell the difference.) If you think cats are stubborn, well, no. Cats are pushovers compared to my sister. Mom would try to get away from it by locking herself in her room until it was over, but she'd always eventually break and give my sister what she wanted. Dad had more patience and stubbornness, and would get angry at Mom for caving in like that, but I totally get it. If I hadn't agreed with Dad on that issue, I might have done the same as Mom. Instead, my own stress and anger would pressure cook inside my brain while I hid in my room, and then it would eventually explode, and I'd storm out of my room and scream and throw stuff around the room, and then it would end when I would hit my sister and turn her tantrum into a meltdown.

Every time that would happen, a switch would flip in my brain. Or rather, one of the others was responsible for the hiding part, and then I - Alex Antonin - would take over for the screaming and breaking things part, and finally the single hit that would flip Fay or Tempest back into control again. They were horrified by my actions. But can you really blame me? Literally nothing would shut her the fuck up apart from giving into her demands. If she'd been my kid, I would have given her up for adoption.

And she would do that shit pretty much every other day. Looking back on it, it's a wonder I never got driven insane enough to drown her in the tub. Looking back on it, with how bad she eventually got, I think I would have been doing my parents a favor if I'd done that. They were too tied down by their unconditional love to give her away, or maybe they considered it and decided it would be too cruel to whoever had to deal with her in their place.

I am not fucking around with how bad she was, how bad she is even now. I even wrote a short story about a changeling baby driving its family so insane that his older sister, at the age of 7, tries to drown him in a tub. Of course, it doesn't work, but only because its actual parent -- a powerful malevolent faery -- shows up to save it, and magically binds any of them from trying to kill it. Inspired partly by the old changeling baby stories, partly by the cuckoos from author Seanan McGuire, partly from (gestures at the rest of the post above), and partly by the stories of black-eyed children.

Seriously, my sister could have been used to torture people at Gitmo. I sometimes fantasize about going back in time and giving Mom a tea made of herbs that cause abortions before my sister could be born, and the much happier life my past self would get as a result as time-traveler me fades away. And about how much better people my parents would be if they hadn't had their own lives ruined by that little shit.

~

Oh, and let's not forget that my half-sister -- who I never even met til I was in my teens (and haven’t seen or spoken with her since) -- is even worse. She's someone so awful that if she caught fire, I’d hand her a full can of gasoline. Even my dad doesn’t like her. Literally the only thing I like about her at all is the fact she's a lesbian. I'll give my dad credit; despite his homophobia, he tried to ignore that about her and tried to establish at least a civil parent/child relationship with her. But her life was even worse than mine. Like, monumentally worse.

Dad was dating her mom when her mom got pregnant, and he wanted to stay and marry her, but her parents hated him for no good reason. She had gotten raped at some point; not sure when, but they were certain Dad was the father of this child, so either years prior to that, or some point during the pregnancy, genuinely have no idea which is worse. Either way, they told Dad to fuck off and forced her to marry her rapist instead. Understandably, stuck married to a rapist who wasn't even the father of her kid, she eventually committed suicide. The rapist either lost custody, died, or fucked off for parts unknown, but my half-sister ended up with her grandparents. Given the fact they forced their daughter to marry a rapist who wasn't even the father of her kid, you can guess what kind of people they were. Except you'd probably be giving them too much credit. I don't know how bad they were, but I'm guessing at least "Flowers in the Attic" but not quite "A Child Called It." I'm pretty sure my half sister developed Stockholm syndrome as a result, and she definetely blamed Dad for "leaving" despite him being so vehemently rejected by her grandparents that I'm surprised they didn't file a restraining order, just because her brain was so fucked up that she thought her abusers were capable of telling the truth about anything.

It's been too long to go into any more detail than that about her, but let's just say that my gift for reading people's hearts got an immediate Red Alert upon first meeting her. This was at a time when I didn't pay much attention to those alerts, not knowing consciously I had the ability to psychically see someone's character until years after moving to Portland. But the more she talked, the more I started taking that Red Alert seriously. I don't know what all was wrong with her, but given she seemed to believe her abusers about Dad, and didn't seem to understand quite how horrible they were (while knowing enough to know that life with our family would have been much better), I'd say she probably absorbed a lot of her grandparents' personalities.

I didn't figure out how bad she was until after years of back and forth letters between her and dad, finally ending in him getting to the point where he gave up and stopped writing back. I don't, again, remember a lot of details from the letters, but with every one of them my estimation of her sunk more and more until it went to the bottom of the Marianas trench and started tunneling down into the mantle.

Really glad he didn't get to marry her mom, though. Apart from the fact that I likely wouldn't exist if he had, there's the fact that if I did somehow exist anyway from their union, I would have had that for grandparents. That, and if those were her parents, I have to wonder how she got out of her childhood sane enough for Dad to want to marry her (but he was also abused as a kid, so that might have something to do with it.)

But my mom and dad did hear about her mom's suicide and the rapist dude being gone, somehow; they would have taken her into our house if the grandparents had also been dead, or had seen the error of their ways. I could have had an older sister living with us. But that didn't happen. Dad probably could have sued for custody, given it was his child (and I guarantee you, I saw his traits in her face and frame; she is for sure his kid), but we were poor and the grandparents weren't the type of person anyone sane would want to tangle with.

(Sigh) I hate humans.

1 = I do find it hilarious that this man who is such an anti-LGBT dingleberry fathered a lesbian with one woman and a non-binary bisexual with another.

Aroace?

Jan. 27th, 2021 12:17 am
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I really don't get much out of sex. It's too much work as well. I liked bottoming the one time it happened, but I'm too anxious about STDs to really do it again, and I've since developed IBS and the occasional haemmeroids (which have been greatly helped by buying a Squatty Potty {oh great Satan I hate the name of that product but it really does work}).

I might possibly be asexual, on the spectrum somewhere. Where, though, I dunno. I still get sexually attracted to people. I still have fantasies. But the reality of sex sucks.

I have similar feelings about romance. (Don't get much out of it, it's too much work.) I might be on the aromantic spectrum as well. I still get crushes on people. But then I think about the work romance typically involves and I'm just like "Nope." And I can't tolerate living with other people. I can have visitors, I can visit others, but living together? Nope. I need to live alone, because I need my privacy and I need time to just chill and recharge on my own. I've tried doing that with other people in the house or apartment, and it doesn't work. If they're in my home, they could come bother me at any time, and that makes me tense. I also have trust issues which don't help matters.

Mostly I just want a cuddle buddy. Someone to come over and snuggle with a couple times a week. Though even that has its limits; I overheat easily, so the room would have to be fairly cool, or the fan blowing on us. Or both.

Bleh. Being a human is fucking annoying. I'd rather be a cat.

There we go, that's my label. I'm not aroace. I am cat.

Rejection

Jan. 14th, 2021 07:52 am
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
On an autism community on FB, someone was discussing the tendency of autistic people to be more sensitive to rejection. This was my response:

I think the biggest reason is the fact of not knowing what we said or did to warrant being rejected. Could explain why I developed such an abrasive and divisive personality, cussing like a sailor and generally not having much of a filter. At least that way when I get rejected, I know exactly why I got rejected (because people can't handle my awesomeness) and I know the friends I have that do stick around are true blue, because if they can tolerate me when I am the way I am, it means they're vibing with me.

Well, that and the fact that I spent my formative childhood years being tortured by my demon-spawn little sister's hours-long crying jags because she's a little demonic piece of garbage. Kinda hard to turn out normal when you have to deal with bullies at school and a banshee you can't kill or banish at home.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I could never have kids. It's my firm believe you shouldn't have kids if you're not going to love them equally and unconditionally, a conclusion I came to after seeing all the people who have had permanent mental scars because they weren't their parents' favorite, or because they were disowned by a parent for being LGBT of some kind, or because they weren't the same religion as the parents.

By that metric, I couldn't have kids because I know for a fact I'm not capable of unconditional love. If the kid is well behaved, kind, and intelligent, I don't care if they're cis, trans, gay, straight, bi, autistic, allistic, mentally ill, mentally well, Christian, Muslim, pagan, or any other legitimate religion. I wouldn't care if they married outside their race or not. I wouldn't mind if they used drugs or not, and if the use of drugs became abuse I would help them get help.

But if they grew up to be bigots, cops, millionaire or billionaire thieves, Ayn Rand fans, conspiracy theorists, Republicans, fascists, Libertarians, or anarcho-capitalists, I would absolutely wonder where I went wrong as a parent and promptly disown them so thoroughly I would pretend to everyone that the offending child had never existed in the first place. Same if they raped someone or committed a hate crime.

If they murdered someone, it would depend on who and why. If I agreed with them that the person deserved to die, I would still love them, even as I turned them in. (No way I'm risking jail to help them move a body or whatever!) Though if the murder victim had been abusing them or someone they loved, I would try to get a lawyer for them to get them off on a self defense plea or whatever.

But if they just killed someone who didn't deserve it, I'd tell them to try to enjoy never being loved ever again! And also to consider themselves disowned.

So yeah. Despite having been raised by parents who love their kids equally and unconditionally, I myself am not capable of that. So I can't have kids because I would be a hypocrite if I did.

Well, that and the fact that I absolutely have zero tolerance for screaming kids. I have enough self control I wouldn't be a physical child abuser, but I can't be sure I wouldn't scream right back at them after a while, and if I ended up with a child that screamed as much as my sister used to, that kid would be up for adoption before it turned 1 years old. And since I don't want to fuck them up for life that way, (either being yelled at constantly, or rejection issues due to being abandoned by a birth parent), it's best I just not have kids at all. Probably a good thing I could never afford a kid anyway.
alex_antonin: Slytherin (Slytherin)
I posted this to Tumblr earlier, in response to one of those posts showing up in my recent activity:

Hey so I just want to say I used to be a massive exclusionist asshole about asexual people (specifically “aro/ace hetero” people) like, a couple years ago on Tumblr. I honestly have no idea what the hell any of that was about, how it got started, or why it was just that subset of aces and no other. No seriously, I don’t know how I got started on that particular bullshit. It went from not being a thing at all, to being A Huge Fucking Thing, and I have no idea why. All I know is once I was on that bullshit, I was like, addicted to it or something. Fuck if I know what was going on. It’s super fucking cringey now to look back on those posts.

I won’t lie and say I’m not still an asshole about some things, because I am. I’ve been just… so angry all my life. Everything sucks, everything hurts me emotionally, and I lash out. I’m trying to improve. One way I’m trying to improve is staying away from Tumblr as much as possible. It’s a toxic place for me, and that just makes this shitty cycle of increasing toxicity.

And part of why I was keeping it up so long, I think, was dealing with a really shitty long-term situation I’ve since gotten out of. Now I’m on my own and I’ve been mellowing out a lot since then. Of course Life still gets to me, still hurts, still causes anger that builds up and comes out in toxic ways.

But I was aiming that rage at entirely undeserved targets, with that whole exclusionism thing I was on. It was hurtful to a lot of people, for absolutely no good reason. If I could undo it all, I would.

So yeah. For whatever it’s worth, there’s my apology, and my promise to be better. Feel free to point exclusionist bigots at me as an example of someone who gave up that bullshit, if you want to. But I totally get it if you don’t want to.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Me: (Just talking normally)
Them: Please sir, there's no need to get angry with me!
Me: Um... excuse me? I wasn't being angry?
Them: You cussed me out!
Me: (Thinks back to what I said. Realizes I said "hell," "damn," and "shit.")
Me: Oh that? No, I'm not angry at all. That's just how I fuckin talk. I use spicy language. I do it so damn much I don't even realize I do it. It's just like, I don't fuckin know... like... punctuation? It's like how some people say "like" a lot. Some people overuse "like," I casually cuss without even realizing I'm doing that shit.
Me: But when I get angry, OH BOY, that's when I get fuckin CREATIVE. Like if I was angry at you right now, I'd call you... I dunno... a leprous, toad-faced demon made of ebola-infected scabs and rotting baby foreskins. Or a "mutated-cow-abortion sandwich with cockroach caviar", or something like that.
Them: O_O
alex_antonin: (infohazard)
I find it very amusing that you think autistic people are noisy, when I’m autistic and yet offline I am very quiet and I personally find neurotypicals and other allistic (“normal”) people to be irritatingly loud all the blessed time.

Seriously, neurotypicals/allistics:

1. Apparently love pointless conversations. Seem to be so much in need of hearing their own voice or the voices of others that they will engage literally anyone in pointless “small talk” when there’s been silence for more than about a minute, regardless of how obvious it is that the person they’re trying to talk to doesn’t want to socialize.

Aside from my bafflement at why anyone would want to socialize with a complete stranger in the first place, the fact is this “small talk” has no redeeming qualities whatsoever and is just so much noise pollution in my opinion. (“What’s the weather like?” Why don’t you look out a window? “How bout them Broncos?” Sports are some of the most pointless human activities on the planet, utter wastes of time, money, resources, and effort; talk about something interesting why don’t you?)

And the fact that I can be reading a book with headphones and dark sunglasses on and still get accosted by NTs with their incessant need to pollute the air with small talk just makes me wonder why you think it’s us being noisy.

2. Apparently love music to fill every single moment when they’re out in public place like grocery stores. This has always bothered me. Ideally, I would go grocery shopping in complete silence, it would be perfect. Maybe the occasional understandable announcement over the loudspeakers, but it drives me mad how there’s almost nowhere you can go in public these days without the incessant noise of music or TVs or talk radio everywhere. What is with NTs and their love of noise?

3. Apparently love noisy cars. Pretty sure if autistic people were the norm, that cars would either all be quiet electric cars by now, or there’d be soundproofing put around car engines because honestly the number of autistic people I’ve met who, like myself, cannot tolerate traffic noise, is quite high.

And I know for a fact that nobody autistic would ever have invented noisy motorcycles. Honestly, I don’t understand how anyone can tolerate riding such horrible noisy things, I can barely stand to be 10 blocks away from the blessed things. Even at that distance I have to cover my ears!

4. Apparently love talking on the phone all the time. The best thing to be invented, IMHO, is electronic text-based communication. Me and my friends do talk with one another on occasion, but usually we communicate via texts, emails, or instant messaging, even when we’re in the same room, and I adore it! I get so angry and frustrated whenever I’m forced outside, all the people on the bus talking so loudly I have to put sound-blocking headsets on to hear myself think.

Or worse, talking on the bloody phone in public! If it wasn’t for the fact that the voice part of the phone is sometimes necessary, I would just get a text-messaging-only phone. Fully 99% of my cell phone communication is text messages. More often than not, people’s voices just grate on my nerves.

5. Apparently love talking so much they’ll engage fellow employees in pointless conversations at work. It has always been so extremely frustrating for me trying to tolerate NT/allistic-designed workplaces in the first place, without having to also tolerate forced conversations with people I neither know nor care to know prattling on filling the air with conversational noise pollution. It always made working so much harder to do because it messes with my concentration and the sheer level of irritation it fills me with is emotionally draining. An 8 hour shift on my own in a job that didn’t have any required social aspect to it (like manufacturing jobs) would fly by, but put other people in the area with me and they would insist on talking just to talk, which would make an 8 hour shift feel more like a 16 hour shift.

6. Apparently love to talk with their neighbors for some reason. Something else I’ve never understood. I have never gotten to know my neighbors, and neither have my parents. I’ve lived in this apartment building for several years now, and I know the names of exactly two people out of the dozen or so people who live here (not counting my roommate), and both of those were already friends with me before I lived here. I don’t know the names of anyone else in this place, I don’t even remember most of their faces, and yet so many of them seem to think I ought to know their names and faces by now. I actually even had a conversation the other day where one of the people whose faces I know asked me if I knew her name, and I had to admit that I didn’t.

I cannot stand to socialize with someone just because they’re close at hand. Most NTs/allistics I’ve met in my life are so supremely boring that having any conversation with them that is longer than 30 seconds makes me want to scream. Honestly, I completely ignore most allistics, especially neighbors, and in my mind I designate them NPCs (Non-Player Characters), except that they’re nowhere near that interesting or important in my opinion.

The two people whose names and faces I know in this place? Yeah, one of them is autistic and I’m pretty sure the other one isn’t NT either, but she and I have been friends for over a decade now, so I know she’s interesting.

7. Apparently love forcing children to socialize with people they hate in school. Two words: group projects. UGH! It was bad enough when they assigned me to people who were just your standard Boring Normal, but on several occasions they put me in groups with people who were bullying me, and were thus The Enemy. Kids should not have to be subjected to that kind of torture, and neither should adults in the workplace.

Of course, the entire school system is a nightmare for people like me to begin with. Forced socialization, nothing is ever done about bullying, rampant ableism, and there’s boring and stupid teachers who don’t even properly know their subjects to the point that it was a regular occurrence for me as early as about fourth or fifth grade for me to know more about some subjects than the teachers did. And how the heck does anyone manage to learn anything when you’re too busy being bored to tears?

Honestly, there’s a reason play is how animals including humans learn things. Sitting in neat little rows facing the front, being quiet, and listening to a lecture is something that is universally boring even into adulthood, and is anathema to learning. That kind of thing is why I frequently tell people that school is where learning goes to die. Seriously. A friend of mine goes to an elementary school during the school year to read to the kids there, and I told her I thought I knew why she went there. What I said was “You go there and read to them because for those kids, it’s the one bright spot in a day full of boredom and soul-crushing authoritarianism.” She did not disagree. But I digress.

But yes, forcing kids to socialize with people they don’t want to socialize with is idiotic cruelty. Especially when some of those people may be bullies.


Meanwhile, I haven’t yet met a single autistic person who was noisy like NTs/allistics are. Sure, Lily laughs loudly at times, but I’m usually laughing with her when she does. My fellow autistic friends and I, our social get-togethers are basically just hanging out in the same room doing our own thing, often all of us on our computers, occasionally sending each other interesting links or pictures. Even my roommate, who is an extroverted autistic girl who talks entirely too much for my liking, still knows how to do the “hanging out silently, sending each other interesting stuff” thing and manages it most of the time.
So yeah, when you ask why autistic people are noisy, I have no blessed idea what you’re talking about, because I’ve never in 34 years of life met a noisy autistic person before. Whereas at least 80% of NTs/allistics are noisy all the blessed time!

~ ~ ~

The above was part of my attempt to make my Quora answers more in line with that obnoxious "be nice, be a sniveling dick-weasel respectful" policy of theirs. Whadda ya think? Original question can be found here (link).
alex_antonin: Slytherin (Slytherin)
1) Do you want to get married?

No. Marriage never made any sense to me, such that for a while I was against same-sex marriage as well as opposite-sex marriage. Then I realized it wasn't about me, it was about others having equal rights.

Anyway, marriage is a pointless institution, hopelessly outdated, and was pretty shitty to start with. On top of that, it's utterly ridiculous to think you're going to love someone forever, unless they're your child, parent, or sibling, and that's not really relevant here. What's relevant is that people change. The only constant is change, after all. And pretending for even a minute that marriage is anything other than a pointless waste of time that will inevitably end in divorce or worse is just the height of delusional.

2) Where would you like to get married?

Nowhere, realistically. But if it were to happen for some reason (madness, personality transplant, dementia, becoming a citizen of another country or helping someone become a citizen of this country, or some other sort of necessary fraud), I'd probably go with some woodsy place, it would be a pagan handfasting.

3) If you were getting married in a week, who would be in your wedding party?

In the vanishingly unlikely event of my impending marriage, assuming I did not come to my senses before then, I suppose my friends Brooke, Amy, Lily, Jesse, and some of my pagan meetup friends would get invites.

4) What would your wedding colours be?

Again prefacing this with "in the unlikely event of my marriage," I'd go with green and silver; Slytherin colors. It would be a Slytherin-themed wedding, if I had a choice in it.

5) Does marriage mean to you 'til death do us part?'

Pretty much answered this already, but no. It means 'til death or annullment or divorce do us part.'

On a side note, I've just decided that any "marriage" I got that was happening for some reason that didn't require the full legal marriage, would likely just be an informal thing, not involving the government at all, and vows would reflect this fact by essentially saying "yeah this isn't really a marriage, it's something superficially similar, and could end at any time."
alex_antonin: (Demon)
I want to talk about rules that make perfect sense until someone starts putting in weird exceptions. Specifically, the rule that says you use "A" before a consonant (like "A witch" or "A donkey") and "An" before a vowel, like "an afternoon" or "an obstacle."

That rule makes perfect sense as it is, and is why I always get so angry at stuff like "an historical document." H is a consonant in that word, so it should be "A historical document." Having “An” before “Hour” makes sense because the H in Hour is silent, but if the word has a consonant H, it should be "A" not "An." It always fills me with rage when people do it the wrong way.

And yes, I know "an historic" is the official "correct" way to say it, but it's a bloody stupid exception to an otherwise sensible rule and so it may be correct but it's still Wrong.

Patronus

Jul. 7th, 2017 11:07 pm
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
So I finally got into Pottermore. Naturally, I'm in Slytherin. Found my patronus, too. I got "pine marten." *Looks it up* Okay it's the same patronus that Rowling herself got, interesting.

"Forest and tree wisdom, the ability for trees and forests to be healing places, possessing great wit and cunning, being resourceful and capable of great lateral thinking when necessary, needing to chew something over, protecting your home and yourself, having a great sense of where your boundaries are, swiftness of action and movement, being exploited for what you have and what you do, keeping your body in good condition, general anxiety and fussing over things."

"swiftness of action and movement, being exploited for what you have and what you do, keeping your body in good condition," LOL WTF no. The rest of it's on point though.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
When I was a kid, my parents knew something was different about me, so they had me tested. AFAIK, the doctor only suggested ADD, and not autism/asperger's, probably because even back in the 80's it wasn't a well known diagnosis. My parents rejected the ADD diagnosis because of my ability to hyper-focus on things that interested me, and for a long time I agreed with their assessment once I was old enough to be told about this. I eventually figured that the doc hadn't a clue what he was doing, and worked out for myself that I was an aspie. And I know I am, I did get an official diagnosis for that eventually.

However, I recently found out from someone with ADHD that people with ADHD are capable, sometimes, of hyper-focus. And I figure if people with ADHD can hyper-focus, so can people with ADD, and it's possible I have both ADD and autism, and the two can thus comorbid with one another.

Further evidence: I know I'm somewhere on that spectrum. For a while I thought I might have Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT), which could theoretically also be called Attention Deficit Hypo-activity Disorder, if that weren't the same letters as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. I thought it because, among other things, I react to stimulants much like ADD/ADHD people do, in that stimulants often act as depressants for me. Well, caffeine does at least, up to a point. Past that point, I get jittery, a bit like a mild to moderate panic attack. I figured that out when I drank some Starbuck's coffee a couple times. So I usually drink decaf or herbal tea, now.

And that's still possible that I have SCT. But now I know ADD might be a possibility, too. And I don't offhand recall the details of SCT beyond the fact that my reflexes tend to be slow most of the time. (When I'm in the right frame of mind, they get faster.)

Possibly further complicating things, I also have anxiety.

I guess the reason I'm posting this here is I'm wondering if others have ADD in addition to autism, especially if you also have anxiety. And I'd also like to hear from anyone who has autism mixed with Sluggish Cognitive Tempoo. It would be helpful to compare myself to others if I can, to help sort out which of these things I'm most likely to have.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
On the page of a friend of mine on FaceBook (real friend, not just a "friend"), she was doing that thing where she was blaming third party candidates, and I copy-pasted my post from earlier. Her response was "Valid and well said point. The electoral college is for sure the common enemy. And don't get me started on the DNC."

To which I said, "I've known you long enough to count you a legitimate friend, as opposed to just a FaceBook "friend," to feel capable of giving you more consideration. Same goes for the person I made the comment to originally. Strangers or people I don't really know well, I tend to get pissier with because I don't give a shit about the opinions of people I don't know or care about. With friends, I do care, so I'm calmer and more logical.

Personally, I think social media should have a base Acquaintences and a seperate Friends. But then, I suppose most people are extroverts and consider anyone who holds still more than 5 seconds to be friends, whereas I'm a hell of a lot more picky. I'm sure there are people who think I'm friends with them, and I just consider them somebody I happen to know. When I call someone a friend, I damn well mean it."

~

Which, yeah. Especially after living with my roommate for a few years now, I can see the differences. She has such a very loose definition of "friend" that, especially given how so many of her "friends" treat her (like shit, or like a non-entity), I occasionally point out that her definition of friend is my definition of "acquaintence." If anyone treated me the way some of her "friends" do, I'd be dumping them in a heartbeat and never looking back. But here she's still agonizing six months later about giving up on someone who did nothing but ghost her for years (only talking/texting with her when it suited them, ignoring her completely the rest of the time). I wouldn't tolerate that bullshit for even a week without a damned good excuse, let alone years.

Anyway, so my levels of social stuff:

* Enemies
* Strangers (Subdivisions: A. Mobile background objects. B. Hot/cute! C. THREAT! D. HSS!!!)
* Acquaintences
* Acquaintences+ (Quite a few pagan meetup people in here)
* Friends (Most people I consider friends are here. Subdivided into Internet Friends, RL friends, Pagan Meetup Friends.)
* Friends+ (My roomie is in this one. Not sure who else, if anyone. She might expect to be in Best Friends or Best Friends+ but there are Reasons why she's here instead. One of those Reasons being Trust Issues. Another being Ugh Extroverts. There are more, but most of those are Occult Reasons - occult as in hidden.)
* Best friends (Three people in this column currently, always room for more; no, I won't say who. Don't ask.)
* Best friends+ (Two people in this column currently, always room for more; no, I won't say who. Don't ask.)

Anyone who knows me well enough knows I have little to no patience for bullshit or shitty behavior from strangers. Same is true of acquaintences. People in Friends and higher deserve and gets a lot more patience and consideration from me. (If it weren't for Reasons, roomie would likely be at Best Friends just for the amount of patience I give her.) But no matter how much tolerance and patience I have for people, I always have hard limits. Betrayal is a surefire hard limit. I once knew someone I put in the Friends category, and after a betrayal, they were put soundly in the Enemies category, in the subcategory of "I Wish Them An Agonizing Death Alone and Forgotten By All Loved Ones." So yeah, betrayal can make me go from warm caring kind hearted person to cold angry sociopath in regards to that person. Only without the murdering.

But I'm pretty good at keeping the bad apples out of my Friends groups, so it doesn't happen often. In fact, I can only think of that one. Wait, no... two. It happened twice that I can remember. (My sister doesn't really count because I'm not quite to that level of anger about it yet. I'd forgive her if she apologized. Probably. Which is not something I could do with someone in the "I Wish Them An Agonizing Death etc" category.)

Profile

alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Bishop Sanctimonious the Hypocritical

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 08:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios