Satanic magazines and why they fail
Oct. 6th, 2015 02:09 pmFor all that many Satanists like to make fun of neopagans, at least neopagans can make magazines about neopaganism that last for years, even decades; but every Satanism magazine I've ever seen or heard of has died fairly quickly. And the reason for this is that Satanists tend to be full of the same kind of close-minded, self-righteous fanatacism they supposedly left behind with Christianity. Every branch thinks they're the end all be all of Satanism. So much for "forgetfulness of past orthodoxies." Which reminds me, most of that shitty attitude can be blamed on LaVey, who claimed to be the first actual Satanist, and on his Church of Satan.
Another problem with such magazines is that while paganism is a HUGE umbrella term, with lots of material to talk about and lots of different people with their own perspectives, LaVey did such a number on Satanism that the CoS was the only Satanic group any normies knew about until the Temple of Set, and even the ToS is obscure, especially when compared to the newly rising (morning) star The Satanic Temple.
Thus, Satanism is very limited by comparison to paganism, not as much to talk about, especially if you're not willing to question LaVey's dogma. But I for one would love to have open discourse with other Satanists about philosophy, etc.
I know of at least one topic that could be pursued in a Satanist magazine: discussing the Satanic Sins, the Satanic Rules, and the What Satan Represents. Because while a lot of it is good, there's a lot more that could be added (which I have added to in my own writings), and much that needs editing. Like, I don't think I'll ever get over the fact that what LaVey called Solipsism is actually called Projection, and that's a shame because Solipsism - which is completely different from Projection - should be its own Satanic Sin.
Another problem with such magazines is that while paganism is a HUGE umbrella term, with lots of material to talk about and lots of different people with their own perspectives, LaVey did such a number on Satanism that the CoS was the only Satanic group any normies knew about until the Temple of Set, and even the ToS is obscure, especially when compared to the newly rising (morning) star The Satanic Temple.
Thus, Satanism is very limited by comparison to paganism, not as much to talk about, especially if you're not willing to question LaVey's dogma. But I for one would love to have open discourse with other Satanists about philosophy, etc.
I know of at least one topic that could be pursued in a Satanist magazine: discussing the Satanic Sins, the Satanic Rules, and the What Satan Represents. Because while a lot of it is good, there's a lot more that could be added (which I have added to in my own writings), and much that needs editing. Like, I don't think I'll ever get over the fact that what LaVey called Solipsism is actually called Projection, and that's a shame because Solipsism - which is completely different from Projection - should be its own Satanic Sin.