![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Update on my new Satanism
Aug. 3rd, 2012 05:48 pmWritten: 08/01/2012 7:45 AM
I have mentioned here before that I've been working on a new form of Satanism, one reflecting my own philosophies, one that has Yahweh as a villain. Well, this is an update about that.
This thing has gone through so many names. Either a name was already taken, sometimes not even by other Satanists or Luciferians, or the name sounded okay at first and then sounded like crap. I'm currently calling it Gnostic Setian Luciferianism, AKA Setian Luciferianism, AKA Setloose. Why? Well, because it combines aspects of Luciferianism and Setianism, that's why. And because all the other names were taken or stupid, or both.
( UNDER THE CUT )
One last thing: Baphomet is not a symbol of Satan in this mythos. Baphomet is Its own individual with Its own role in the mythos. In fact, if not for Baphomet, humans would not exist, as sentient beings.
I have mentioned here before that I've been working on a new form of Satanism, one reflecting my own philosophies, one that has Yahweh as a villain. Well, this is an update about that.
This thing has gone through so many names. Either a name was already taken, sometimes not even by other Satanists or Luciferians, or the name sounded okay at first and then sounded like crap. I'm currently calling it Gnostic Setian Luciferianism, AKA Setian Luciferianism, AKA Setloose. Why? Well, because it combines aspects of Luciferianism and Setianism, that's why. And because all the other names were taken or stupid, or both.
( UNDER THE CUT )
One last thing: Baphomet is not a symbol of Satan in this mythos. Baphomet is Its own individual with Its own role in the mythos. In fact, if not for Baphomet, humans would not exist, as sentient beings.