alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
So I ran across this post on Tumblr, of some idiot vegans making the whole "meat is bad for the environment" argument. Which includes such dubious stats as "methane is 25 times more potent a greenhouse gas than CO2" and that manure also releases "nitrous oxide" (whatever the fuck THAT is), which is supposedly 300 times more potent than CO2.

Here was my response:

So collect the fucking methane and burn it for fuel. Problem fucking SOLVED.

It always pisses me off when jackass vegans make the “environment” argument. First, we’re past the point of no return already; even if everyone magically converted instantly to green energy RIGHT THIS INSTANT, we’re already fucked. The planet will live on, but we humans are already fucked and it is too late to change that.

Secondly, you have better odds of forcibly evolving the ability to fly by flapping your arms and jumping off a building than you do of ever getting humans to give up meat. We fucking EVOLVED to eat meat, we need the fucking protein to fuel our brains. But of course, vegans don’t eat meat and so their brains shrivel up and start to die.

It is not possible with current human physiology to have all the protein needed in your diet without eating a fuckton of nuts and soy and so on. And gee, somehow we never ever see the stats on the environmental impact of humans all going vegan. It’s just always assumed to be better than raising meat. But, hey, what do our meat animals eat: PLANTS! And guess what? THEY ARE MORE EFFICIENT AT DIGESTING IT THAN WE ARE. Seriously! When is the last time you digested grass? Food animals can digest more kinds of plants than we can, and get more out of the food they do eat than we do. Plus, food animals MAKE THEIR OWN PROTEIN, which is something humans cannot do. So odds are, humans all going vegan would be WORSE for the environment, not better.

Third, let’s say everyone gives up meat. Congratulations, now cows and chickens and turkeys are probably going to go extinct because humans don’t care about anything that doesn’t profit them. Furthermore, cows and chickens have been symbiotic with humans for far too long for them to survive in the wild; cattle would go extinct if we didn’t eat them. We would end up having to feed them and water them to keep them alive anyway, and if we’re going to do that, we may as well eat them.

So basically: FUCK YOUR STUPID WORTHLESS, ILLOGICAL “LOGIC.”

~ ~ ~

Just wanted to add something else here: gee, somehow the vegans always forget stats like the one that says things like arugula (and who knows what else) use far more water and other resources to produce than is worth it. So yeah, they keep going on about how bad meat is for the environment but they always conveniently forget that a lot of vegetables humans eat are wasteful to grow. Shit, how much water does watermelon need? Oh, and lettuce: human in the first world love the shit out of lettuce, but human bodies aren't even capable of digesting it! And celery isn't much better.

The point is, they keep thinking everyone is going to fucking magically give up meat, and that when they do, the world will be saved by the power of rainbows and puppies because MURICA! Typical fucking first-world hipster thinking, if you can call it "thinking." There are no fucking easy answers, people!
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Among the many flaws in the logic of Christianity and related faiths is one I just thought of: if humans are born sinners, somehow irrevocably evil, then from where comes love and compassion? If their doctrine was right, we would all be fucking, stealing, murdering, and other nasty things all the time. There would be no love, no compassion, no civilization, even. We would be like the worst demons in the Buffy universe, living only for evil.

So much for THAT bullshit, then.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
The Devil is two of three major cognitive dissonances in modern Christianity. The first is "loving kindly God of peace who will rain down fire and brimstone if you misbehave." As to The Devil... here we have a being that is supposed to be the source of all evil, like Ahriman in Zoroastrianism. He supposedly lures people into committing sin and evil, and is hence responsible for all the evil in the world. Now the first cognitive dissonance in regard to The Devil is:

1. If The Devil is the source of all evil, and God is nothing but goodness and light, then that means The Devil has power equal to God. But Christians insist he doesn't, they insist God is more powerful. Which contradicts the "God is all goodness and light" stance. Either The Devil is a power equal to God, or God is just as bad as The Devil or worse. Those are the only two options that do not involve cognitive dissonance. Well, that and "there is no Devil." Or "there is no God, or Devil."

2. The Devil is the source of all evil. Yet he rules Hell, where the sinful and wicked are punished. DOES NOT COMPUTE. This is either like handing over the world willingly to Lord Voldemort, or like making Charles Manson the warden for his own prison.

Profile

alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Bishop Sanctimonious the Hypocritical

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 04:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios