Apr. 19th, 2017

alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
On a video about Steven Universe about a possible blind fusion, I suggested that maybe the Gems can see through their gem if it’s positioned in place of an eye, and someone disagreed with me. But I think I convinced them.

Them: The pupil is the main part of the eye that lets light into the eye in order for us to see. If that's covered up you can't see no more, homie

Me: Yes, but they're not human, or even biological. They're Clarke-tech AIs that resemble humans but are basically hard-light constructs like the doctor on Star Trek Voyager. If the light can come out of the gem to create their body, it's possible and logical that the light can go into the gem from the outside, especially since we know already that information from the body can and does go into the gem (if it didn't, they'd lose all life memories every time they poofed). Especially if I'm right that they're solar powered slash powered by ambient radiation. Because according to canon, they get all the energy they need when they form, but given they live thousands of years or longer, that defies the laws of thermodynamics so hard as to be ridiculous, so they have to be getting extra power from somewhere else, too.

Them: Huh. Never thought of it that way. Thanks for the enlightenment

Me: Granted, the crewniverse never says they're AIs anywhere that I know of, but there's really nothing else they *could* be. No way does an immortal optical computer with a holographic body that mimics a bipedal organic lifeform just *evolve.*

~

And now that I think about it, since they reproduce artificially by injecting something into the ground with machines, that just *screams* "AI" to me.

Edited to add: Centipeedle seems to be able to see with her eye-gem.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Some fool on Quora: sex is not an arbitrary label. Sex is a biological descriptor. One is free to say that gender is a social construct, and therefore arbitrary and fluid. Sex is not a social construct, neither is it arbitrary or fluid, anymore than eye color is.

Me: Ask a scientist who specializes in intersex conditions whether sex is an arbitrary label or not. There are sooooo many different ways to be intersex, there are cis females with XY chromosomes, and some of them can even get pregnant! There are XYYY males, XYY males, I believe there are people who are just X (not XX or XY but just X), and there are hundreds maybe thousands of ways for genitalia and secondary sex characteristics to differ.

And then there are other species. There are species where the female has something like a penis and uses it on the male. There are bees, who technically have three sexes: Male, Female, and Neuter. But so many people, even scientists, are so hung up on these meaningless human sex labels that they say BS like “All bees are females except for the drones, and only the queen can reproduce” which is patently false.

Male and female are human labels, humans are social animals, and humans developed male/female labels for social reasons regardless of why scientists use them, thus male/female ARE social constructs. And the fact that intersex people and animals exist, transgender people and animals exist (which could be considered a form of Intersex, given findings about transgender people’s brains), and the fact that even non-intersex cisgender vary so greatly that nobody can really define gender or even sex without basically going “I’ll know it when I see it” means that yes, sex IS fluid and largely arbitrary.

It’s just that almost nobody really talks about how weird this whole sex/gender thing is unless they happen to be a scientist or a doctor or learning to be one of the two, or if they happen to be intersex or know someone who is. Also, Intersex people almost always get genital mutilation (sorry, “correction”) surgery as infants without the doctors even having to INFORM the parents, and heaven forbid they should have to actually ASK PERMISSION before mutilating a baby’s genitals! People have this ridiculous notion that there’s just male and female, and it’s always clear and obvious, but it’s all just BS.

It’s all very weird and confusing, but it gets a lot less confusing when you finally sit back and admit to yourself that sex and gender are human labels, largely arbitrary, mostly meaningless, and Nature’s response to such labels is going to be a whole lot of “Eff you and your arbitrary BS labels.”
alex_antonin: (Baphomet)
Someone referred to someone else as “naziesque” today, which prompted me to say the following:

“I object to calling someone a Nazi unless they are in fact literal Nazis, as in national socialists/alt-right. Because then when groups like Antifa International try to point out that individuals like Richard B. Spencer are literal Nazis, people use the overuse of Nazi-calling on the Internet as an excuse to gaslight them.”

Profile

alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Bishop Sanctimonious the Hypocritical

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 2nd, 2025 04:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios