alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
I've been doing some thinking about this whole "dogs CAN survive on a vegan diet" thing. Frankly, it still smells like bullshit to me. But I've been thinking about it... even if it is true, I still say it's unethical. Here we have dogs, a creature that in the wild eats 99% meat and 1% plant matter. Wild canines only eat plants for medicinal purposes, or when eating the stomach contents of their prey. This makes them carnivores.

A lot of people get confused about what "carnivore" really means, because a lot of people who prefer meat to vegetables call themselves carnivores. No, sorry, that does not make you a carnivore, it makes you an omnivore. All humans are omnivores, regardless of their personal dietary preferences, because that is how humans evolved. The teeth and internal organs of omnivores are very disctinctive. Herbivores, omnivores, and carnivores have very different insides and teeth; you can tell what an animal's diet is by their teeth and their digestive system. And like it or not, humans are definetely omnivores.

Veganism works for some humans because humans are omnivores. If humans were true carnivores, it would take some kind of weird evolutionary fluke to subsist on plants alone, as in panda bears. (Pandas are biologically carnivores, but somehow they manage to survive only on bamboo. They are, thus, an evolutionary oddity.)

But dogs are true carnivores. Therefore, it doesn't matter if they can, somehow, survive on a vegan diet. Just because you can survive something doesn't mean you're happy or healthy. There is just no possible way for a truly carnivorous species like dogs to thrive on a vegan diet. I know a lot of stupid people say the same kind of thing for human vegans, but those people are idiots. Hindus have proven that humans can thrive on a vegan diet; they've been doing it for centuries. But dogs? Dogs may survive a vegan diet, but there's no way for them to even begin to approach thriving.

With this in mind, I sincerely believe forcing a vegan diet on a dog is unethical, and is at least animal neglect, if not animal cruelty. I think there ought to be a law against forcing a dog to be a vegan, I sincerely do.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
An outdoor adventure company recently slaughtered 100 dogs after not seeing the amount of business they expected. Why is that most people are appalled by the actions that this company took, but don't give a second thought to the number of cows, chickens or sheep that are killed every year on farms? Why do most people have different reactions depending on the animal?

Good question. I personally dislike dogs. But I'd love to find out what one tastes like as a steak or a burger.

I'm not just saying this to be shocking, either. I really would. I genuinely don't see what would be wrong with it. Chihuahuas were bred for meat, originally. (Hey, uh, "culture that bred Chihuahuas"? You did it wrong. Chihuahuas are small and scrawny and not worth much, meat-wise.) What's the difference between eating a dog and eating a cow? Only difference I can see is it's easier to feed a cow, because they eat plants. Although I suppose you could feed a dog roadkill and leftover bits of meat and stuff. As long as you don't feed them dog meat; cannibalism causes Mad Cow Disease and related diseases.

Cats, on the other hand... aside from being cute, I can't imagine they'd be worth anything as food. Scrawny, wiry little bastards that they are. No meat on their bones (if they can even be said to have bones. Seriously, the contortions cats can do, I think they're made of dimensionally transcendental materials). A better use for cats would be to hunt mice, have them feed the mice and rats to the dogs. You know, if cats really ARE made of dimensionally transcendental material, one could probably eat them to steal their powers; "you are what you eat" and all that. Or maybe not.

I'm reminded of the video that was going around where these people were eating a cat. I don't know what became of them. But if I were them, and the ASPCA or whatnot tried to charge me with cruelty to animals, I would contest it; I would say that if eating a cat or a dog is cruelty to animals, then eating ANY animal is cruelty to animals. And it's not like cats and dogs are endangered or anything. In fact, in places where cats and dogs are not supposed to be wild, but are, killing them (and/or eating them) would be a good thing, since they're decimating local wildlife. Places like Australia needs to kill off their feral cat population. I'd personally get rid of all feral dogs there, too. Even dingoes. Those bastards were introduced by the aborigines, and helped drive the thylocine extinct. Bastard dingoes, I will never forgive them for that. I wonder what dingoes taste like? Oh, and rabbits are a major pest there, too, and already considered edible.

If I were filthy stinking rich (and the others would let me do it), it would be an interesting experiment to raise dogs for food; treat them well while alive, either have them free-range or take them on frequent walks, slaughter them humanely. Then when the inevitable freak-out over animal cruelty comes, spend money on the legal defense of "WTF, people? I'm not mistreating these animals. They live MUCH better lives, happier lives, before I slaughter them for meat, than commercially-produced cows, chickens, and hogs do. Why don't you go bother the factory farms about animal cruelty? Their conditions are absolutely horrid."

I wonder if Trader Joe's or any of these other similar grocery stores would sell organic, cage-free, free-range canine meat. "Guaranteed to come from happy animals! Humanely slaughtered!" I wonder how well they'd sell. But I know one thing: even the attempt would be a MAJOR controversy.
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
[Error: unknown template qotd]I don't know, but I'd put my money on the megalodon. Large mouth and many rows of sharp pointy teeth? Oh yeah!

Bonobos

May. 10th, 2006 05:22 pm
alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (FSM2)
1. Go to Google.

2. Look up "bonobo" on it.

Bonobos are fucking awesome. Whereas regular chimps are violent and dangerous (even though cute), bonobos are peaceable and love to make love with each other. Bonobos, humans, and regular chimps evolved from a common ancestor. Which explains humans, I think. If the common ancestor had the chimps' violence and the bonobos' love of love, well... humanity makes more sense that way. Not complete sense, but just a little more sense than it did.

With utmost sincerity;
---Alexander Antonin

Profile

alex_antonin: TST Antifascist (Default)
Bishop Sanctimonious the Hypocritical

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 07:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios