⛧ First Church of Hypocrisy, Blasphemy, and Self-Righteousness ⛧

I think I've finally narrowed down why I don't like dogs. Because I like wolves, but not dogs. Except huskies I don't seem to mind. I think what it is, is that humans took the proud and noble wolf and turned it into a mentally deficient inbred mutant bred to be a living tool. And the fact that I get squicked by saliva, and a lot of these inbred freaks also drool, doesn't help them. That, and they're loud (but not even in an interesting way), they eat literal shit, they're unclean, and they're hyperactive. Like furry infants, but somehow even worse. (I don't like infants, either.)

This could explain why I like cats, but I can't stand the weird breeds like the Scottish fold cats, the cats with tiny corgi legs, the hairless cats, and those ugly squashed-face cats. Because cats domesticated themselves, so most of them are pretty much as they were when they began. It's the inbred mutant "breeds" humans make that I can't stand.

Oh, and while we're at it, this could also partially explain why I don't like humans, either. Aside from the fact that humans are just fucking horrible, humanity is fucking inbred as all fuck, too. There was a genetic bottleneck a long damn time ago, reduced our total world population down to 10K. So now we're all inbred as fuck, which explains why there's less genetic diversity in our species than there is in dogs, even. (Fuck, when you get down to it, dogs, wolves, foxes, dingoes, and several other “species” are all the same species, genetically, judging by the fact that they can breed with one another and create viable offspring. And yet humans will insist on calling them different species. Calling a fox a different species from a wolf is like calling black and white people seperate species; it just ain't true.)

Seems to me, from observation, I'd guess that white people (yes, my own "race") are the most inbred of all "races" of humans. Because I can usually tell POC apart from one another, despite having partial face blindness. But about half the white people in the world look like goddamn identical twins. It's even worse in Hollywood; the old celebs, not so much. But the new ones all seem to be clones of the Alpha White Male and the Alpha White Female.

Oh yes, I've known for years that I don't like dogs because they're too much like humans. Wolves, I respect; wolves are cool. Dogs, though... I pity the poor inbred freaks.

Imagine a game where most people have to work very hard for years to make much progress in the game. Some barely manage to keep their characters alive despite years of extremely hard work. (And in this game, once you die, you can never play it again.) And some players can't even feed themselves or their children.

Now imagine that a very small percentage of people in the game find, upon first logging in, that the game is extremely easy for them, and don't have to do much more than log in and stare at the screen to get fabulously wealthy and powerful. And instead of being generous with their amazing luck and helping their fellow players to not suffer so much, they put forth a lot of effort to get even more wealthy. Like ancient stories of dragons, all they do is sit on their gold, or use it to get more. They know that the money is meaningless, ultimately, if only because it's only good within the game.

A game that unfair would not be tolerated, if it were a video game. So why, when we are playing it for real, are we tolerating it?

Humans have some fucking weird double standards sometimes. For example: People who molest children (or merely get ACCUSED of doing so) get viewed as these utterly horrible and irredeemable people that supposedly cannot be rehabilitated, and get put on a blacklist for life (whether found guilty or not) that makes it nearly impossible for them to find work and housing after being released from prison, and sometimes they even get castrated (a "treatment" that never works)... Yet murderers - people who end the life of another person - don't elicit the same disgust; murderers can be rehabilitated. Paroled or pardoned murderers can live a long, fairly normal lives after prison and don't have to tell anyone what they've done. WHAT THE FUCK? So, what? Diddling a toddler is a worse crime than going to the trouble of buying a gun specifically to kill a person, finding them, and blowing their fucking brains out? What the fucking hell is wrong with people, where they think inappropriate touching is a crime worse than ENDING SOMEONE'S FUCKING LIFE??? Makes no sense at all. I mean, if there's going to be a blacklist for sex offenders, there should be one for murderers, too. Hell, some people even *admire* murderers. Why is it that admitting to admiring murderers doesn't elicit the same reaction as admitting to admiring child molesters? Why do sex offenders have to be ostracized the shit out of all their remaining days, but a paroled murderer can go on his or her merry way as though they didn't commit the single worst crime there is, short of genocide? Fuck, blacklist both groups or neither, but this double-standard shit is just insane.

Seriously, I can't think of any crime worse than ending someone's life, except maybe torturing the crap out of them first.